Welcome

You are welcome to read any and all of the posts here. Comment at will, but be warned, as in Communist China, I will be filtering comments...

Hu out.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

You Asked! Okay... You Didn't

But you're getting it anyway...

My friend led me to an article posted by Andrew Sullivan at The Daily Dish. And I see some problems with it and it's basic premise.

First of all, a true Conservative (as understood in the United States today) will NEVER vote for a Democrat. Simply reading this document should prove my point. A conservative DOES NOT share those ideas.

Secondly, I am sick and tired of hearing, "I'm conservative economically, but more liberal socially." This line is complete bullshit. The two viewpoints CANNOT overlap. You cannot be economically conservative and socially liberal AT THE SAME TIME!!! It does not work! You can't at least from the governmental point of view.

Personally, one can do with his money what he pleases - this is a point of a free society. If you want to give half of it to a charity so they can help the homeless or get a family back on it's feet, God bless you. But when the government starts taking my money, involuntarily, and thinking they are going to make those decisions for me... fuck them.

But back to the article. The main difference between the presidential candidates is their tax policies. It may sound like small potatoes, but taxes have a big effect on the economy and employment. This is the basis in which I disagree with Barry Hussein's 'plan' for his presidency.


Here's the link again to the article I'm going to opine about. Give 'er a glance, then come read...

10. Maybe the end of Jesse Jackson in black America is a good thing. But racial identify politics only come about when you speak OF them. I'm not a black man unless you call me a black man, I'm just a man, maybe just a person. What does my penis/vagina have anything to do with my politics. Why suddenly a 'black' man is a candidate for president is some historic event I'll never know. Maybe I'm just not old enough.

9. Less debt. Tax revenue has little to do with debt. Federal revenue has been a constant percentage of GDP for 50 years. But Barry says he's only going to raise taxes on the rich. THIS IS A BOLD FACED LIE. What is Barry up to? He's going to raise taxes on EVERYONE. Debt will not be decreased, because government revenue will DECREASE, and spending will continue to INCREASE. Simple second grade math should tell you this will not work.

8. The one line in this group that gets me is, "McCain's knee-jerk reaction to the Georgian conflict." McCain was spot on on this remark. BHO was twiddling and waiting for polls to tell him what to say. Georgia is a burgeoning free republic in the middle of the old USSR. Their president was educated and worked in the USA before becoming president. He respects and admires the founding principles of our country - which more Americans should also. Saying that both sides should have restraint is complete bullshit when another country invades a free republic to attempt to control energy flow. Georgia had every right to do what was necessary to defend itself, and the US should have been there with them. I would trust McCain with foreign policy over a community organizer and junior senator from Illinois any day.

7. The office of President of the United States of America comes with another title: commander-in-chief. One may not like it, but he/she has the decision making power over the US military. This isn't a fuhrer-like system, but still a very rigid structure. And again, a decorated (and tortured) veteran would be light years better at the helm of that system then Barry. I don't know why this is even an argument.

6. "The irrational impulsiveness of McCain." Ignorance brings with it a calm temperament that would only be exemplified by the most inexperienced Presidential candidate in a long time... I enjoy McCain's temperament, it assures me that he's also 'feeling' what he's saying, not just spitting out talking points.

5. The very idea that a presidents faith is some sort of 'bridge' to unite those on either side of religion is the very argument that his supporters would use. Americans have the faith they practice because they are free to do so. If one thinks that "Christianity and reason" are somehow separated, you welcome some theological education.

4. "Truce in the culture war." I don't even know what this means, and I don't have time to read the linked document he has posted. But seems like another saving grace of 'The One' that has been attributed to him by 'his followers.'

3. Two words: President Obama (shudder)

2. I sort of agree with this one. REAL Conservatism has lost is focus and needs a kick in the pants. This is something that can come within the party, but people need to be on board. Electing Barry would be a sign to this point, but not the sign I want to see.

1. I completely disagree with this point. Research the history of the Iraq and Afghanistan 'wars' and you'll see that things are going well in Iraq, and Afghanistan could use a boost. This boost only comes with completion in Iraq, not a cut-and-run. As Iraq goes, so goes the region.


Does any of this change my vote, my opinions on the candidates or the future of this country? No. I felt it prudent to share my thoughts on these topics and hope you can see my point.

My final point of the Presidential election of 2008: If Barry Hussein is elected, it will be quickly shown (to intelligent Americans) to be one of the biggest mistakes of the early 21st century. That sounds prophetic and quite bold, but I can only hope that I don't have to be proven right.

-HypnotistOfLadies :-\


Next Point: I will make my point on Taxes as relating to the 2008 Presidential candidates and what it means for the US.

No comments: